这里是何凯文每日一句第239句，俄州政府采取了很激进的手段将那些他们认为不合格的选民从投票人名单上直接去掉，而最 高法院竟然同意了这种做法。这是文都考研今天带给大家的句子，并且要告诉大家，这世界哪有什么一鸣惊人，不过是十年如一日的坚持！！
州府之争:2020何凯文每日一句第239句
今天的句子：
A 5–4 decision gives the green light for states to use aggressive methods to remove voters from the rolls, a process that disproportionately affects minority communities.
Alito, writing for a five-justice majority, resolved a seeming conflict among provisions of federal voting law by concluding that the aggressive procedure Ohio adopted to remove supposedly ineligible voters from its voter rolls, does not violate federal statutes.
思考题一：
There used to be a seeming conflict among provisions of federal voting law
思考题二：
Ohio adopted the aggressive procedure to take away some voters away from its voter rolls.
思考题三：
The author does not agree with Court’s decision in terms of minority communities.
思考题四：
Alito opposes the aggressive procedure Ohio adopted.
词汇突破：
1. 5–4 decision 5比4 的决定 (法院是9位大法官，所以他们都投票了。)
以后大家看到8：0就知道一个法官由于种种原因没有参加投票;
2.A gives the green light for B： A为B开绿灯
3. aggressive method 激进的方法
4. the rolls 名册= voter rolls 选民的名册
5. disproportionately 不成比例的;不相称;(贬义词，负面评价)
6. Alito 九个大法官之一(2013年第四篇文章应该不陌生吧!)
7. minority communities 少数族裔社区
8. resolve 解决
9. writing for a five-justice majority (投了5票多数票中的一票)
Kevin, writing for a four-justice minority (凯文投四票少数票中的的)
10. seeming conflict 貌似的冲突
11. provisions 条款
12. federal voting law 联邦选举法=federal statutes 联邦成文法
13. supposedly ineligible voters 被认为是没有资格的选民
14.remove A away from B: 把A从B中去除;
(原文的表达是：Purge B of A(把A从B中去除) ; 这个词的用法还挺有意思的，只不过的超纲词，我就替换了。大家可以了解一下。)
15. violate 破坏
句：(不是线索句，没有资格和选项进行比对)
A 5–4 decision gives the green light for states to use aggressive methods to remove voters from the rolls, a process that disproportionately affects minority communities.
切分：
1.A 5–4 decision gives the green light for states to use aggressive methods to remove voters from the rolls.
(5比4的投票结果为各州开了绿灯，使各州能使用激进的手段将选民从名册中去掉。)
2. a process that disproportionately affects minority communities.(前面整个句子的同位语。)
= 1. This is a process
2. The process disproportionately affects minority communities
参考译文：5比4的投票结果为各州开了绿灯，使各州能使用激进的手段将选民从名册中去掉。这一做法将对少数族裔群体产生的影响(不成比例的影响。)
第二句：
Alito, writing for a five-justice majority, resolved a seeming conflict among provisions of federal voting law by concluding that the aggressive procedure Ohio adopted to remove supposedly ineligible voters from its voter rolls, does not violate federal statutes.
切分：
1. Alito, writing for a five-justice majority, resolved a seeming conflict among provisions of federal voting law
阿利托投了五票多数票中的一票，解决了联邦选举法条款之间似乎存在的冲突。2. by 2. 2.concluding that the aggressive procedure/ Ohio adopted(定语一)/ to remove supposedly ineligible voters from its voter rolls(定语二), does not violate federal statutes.
the aggressive procedure does not violate federal statutes
阿利托认定，俄亥俄州采取的旨在将被认为不合格的选民从选民名册中除名的激进措施，并不违反联邦法规的规定。
参考译文：阿利托投了五票多数票中的一票，解决了联邦选举法条款之间似乎存在的冲突。俄亥俄州采取的旨在将被认为不合格的选民从选民名册中除名的激进措施，阿利托认为这样做并不违反联邦法规的规定。
思考题一：
There used to be a seeming conflict among provisions of federal voting law
根据原文：a seeming conflict among provisions of federal voting law
可以判为正确!
思考题二：
Ohio adopted the aggressive procedure to take away some voters away from its voter rolls.
根据原文：the aggressive procedure/ Ohio adopted(定语一)/ to remove supposedly ineligible voters from its voter rolls(定语二)
可以判为正确!
思考题三：
The author does not agree with Court’s decision in terms of minority communities.
根据原文：The process disproportionately affects minority communities
这里的disproportionately 就是一个负面评价
所以就表现了作者的不认同;
可以判定为正确
思考题四：
Alito opposes the aggressive procedure Ohio adopted.
根据原文：the aggressive procedure does not violate federal statutes
Alito 不反对!
可以判定为错误!
——KK
相关阅读：
同学们你们知道吗？优于别人，并不高贵，真正的高贵应该是优于过去的自己，考研复习是一件枯燥的事，也许过程有些煎熬，但真的，熬过去就好了，你一天比一天好，就是成功。从何凯文每日一句开始学习吧，2020考研人，所谓好运气，不过是机遇遇到了努力，加油。
文都考研微信
