考研英语复习：何凯文每日一句系列，文都考研网，每日更新！如果你从现在开始坚持，那么成功的路就在脚下！本文整理2021考研英语何凯文每日一句第218句。同时提醒大家，2021考研英语新大纲已发布，不要忘记关注2021考研英语新大纲深度解读（精编版）。
同时提醒大家，2021考研英语新大纲已发布，不要忘记关注2021考研英语新大纲深度解读（精编版）。
复盘昨天的题目：
But as we move away from the skinny goals of the mid-2000s and embrace different shapes and sizes, one group of campaigners has taken things a step too far. Fronted by plus-sized models and social media influencers, the fat acceptance movement aims to normalize obesity, letting everyone know that it’s fine to be fat.
思考题:
There is a new campaign to embrace the idea of being fat.
昨天各位宝宝们对于NEW这个词很不满。
我也能理解，反驳的理由很简单，
关于接受肥胖不是从mid-2000s 就开始了吗?
但是情况是这样的：
embrace ：接受，理解!
mid-2000s人们认为应该接受不同的体型。
但是现在：
aims to normalize obesity, letting everyone know that it’s fine to be fat(让肥胖正常化，让人觉得正常很好。)
这才是 a new campaign，
这个也是关于肥胖的观念啊!
懂了的来认错!
再理一下时间线：
关于肥胖：
1. mid-2000s 让人们接受不同的身材，胖也可以。
2.现在让人们觉得胖是正常的!让每个人都要觉得胖是fine的!
这不就是新的运动了吗!!!
听懂掌声!
今天的任务一定是复习!
同学们，这些都是经典啊!
我来帮你回顾和复习真题了!
昨天没做题的来做题：
第218句：
1.Few would dispute that the term applies to the Unabomber, whose manifesto, published in 1995, scorns science and longs for return to a pre-technological utopia. But surely that does not mean environmentalists concerned about uncontrolled industrial growth are anti-science, as an essay in US News & World Report last May seemed to suggest.
判断：Environmentalists were blamed for anti-science in an essay. (Tor F )
答案是正确!
题的解析在这个链接里：
别怕，你要没听懂，我就再给你讲!(106句)
2. Science, in practice, depends far less on the experiments it prepares than on the preparedness of the minds of the men who watch the experiments.
实际上，科学更少依靠实验，更多的依靠观察实验的有准备的大脑。
判断：Inquiring minds are more important than scientific experiments. (Tor F )
这是正确的!
Inquiring minds= the preparedness of the minds of the men
探究性的大脑比科学实验更重要。
这是典型的同义替换，记住就好!而且要从心里接受这样的替换。最 好背下来!
3. NBAC members were divided on whether to go further by calling for a federal law that would impose a complete ban on human cloning.
是否应该进一步地呼吁联邦法律完全禁止克隆人?在这个问题上，NBAC成员们的意见发生了分化。
判断：Some NBAC members hesitate to ban human cloning completely. (Tor F )
这是正确的!
NBAC的一些成员对完全禁止克隆人犹豫不决。
还可以写一个答案：
NBAC的一些成员同意完全禁止克隆人。
这是典型的同义替换，记住就好!而且要从心里接受这样的替换。最 好背下来!
4. There is the analogy /that likens the conduct of monetary policy to driving a car with a blackened windscreen, a cracked rear-view mirror and a faulty steering wheel.
有一种类比，将实施货币政策比作驾驶一辆带有黑色挡风玻璃、后视镜破裂和方向盘失灵的汽车。
判断：Making monetary policies is comparable to driving a car. (Tor F )
制定货币政策被比作为开车。错!
两个错误：
1)the conduct of monetary policy和Making monetary policies严格讲是有区别的。2) 比较的时候，不能偷换比较对象，一般而言用车替换破车是可以的，
但比较的时候，用车替换破车就是偷换比较对象了。就是不对的!
而且制定政策和实施政策也是不一样的!
这是典型的偷换!而且要从心里警惕这样的偷换。
5. People are absorbed into “a culture of consumption”/ launched by the 19th-century department stores /that offered “vast arrays of goods in an elegant atmosphere.
人们被19世纪百货商店所发起的“消费文化”所吸引。百货商店在优雅的氛围中提供琳琅满目的商品。
判断：The department stores of the 19th century owed its emergence to the culture of consumption (Tor F )
19世纪的百货公司的出现归功于消费文化。错!
launched by the 19th-century department stores
这里是关键!独立成句：
“a culture of consumption” was launched by the 19th-century department stores
百货商店是主动;消费文化是被动!
所以思考题偷换了主被动关系!
这是典型的偷换!而且要从心里警惕这样的偷换。
6.“It is really important to understand and try and tease out what is the human connection with fire today, ”Balch says.
“今天，理解、尝试并梳理出人类与火之间的联系是非常重要的，”巴尔克说。
判断：Professor Balch points out that fire is something man should do away with.
巴尔奇教授指出，人类应该抛弃火。错!
关键就在于：
tease out：梳理
do away with：抛弃
这就是偷换!这是英语二的真题!
这是典型的偷换!而且要从心里警惕这样的偷换!
7.原文：But policymakers who refocus efforts on improving well-being rather than simply worrying about GDP figures could avoid the forecasted doom and may even see progress.
但是，如果政策的制定者能重新关注提升人民的幸福，而不是仅仅担心GDP的数据，那么就能避免预计的末日，甚至可能看到进步。
判断：It is essential to consider factors beyond GDP
考虑除开GDP之外的因素非常重要。
注意：这里的beyond是除开的意思。
所以这是正确的!
同学们，如果你有了考研的想法，现在就可以开始行动，从何凯文每日一句开始学习吧，2021考研人，每日一句的用法：1.先看英文句子译为中文，做题练翻译。2.根据参考译文修改翻译，对答案订正。3.读背景介绍了解相关话题，拓宽视野。4.背词汇突破积累单词，强化命 题思路。这样就能最 大化的利用每日一句！
文都考研微信
